Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Harding's avatar

Well said Katy! I watched at least part of the testimony of these three university presidents and found it cringeworthy. Yes, perhaps they were struggling under the stress, but isn’t it part of their job to speak on behalf of the university leadership, and to answer difficult questions? Yes, the questions from the Congress members were tough, and sometimes aggressive, but the presidents’ answers lacked moral clarity. For example, claiming that the acceptability of calls for the genocide of Jews depends on the context implies that there are contexts where such calls could be justified. Obviously, there are no such contexts. Also, claiming that such speech should not be disciplined unless it translates into conduct (meaning actually committing genocide?) is preposterous. I can see why the Congress members became angry.

Expand full comment
Justin Jos's avatar

I'm surprised by the (metaphoric) moral silence shown by well meaning friends working in international law when it comes to calls for Israel's destruction. It is this silence that scares me. This is not to justify Israel's response or exonerate Hamas for its crimes. However, it seems we are in hyper partisan times especially on morally evocative issues. https://www.justsecurity.org/90358/a-plea-to-the-international-law-community-on-de-humanizing-and-the-october-7th-atrocities/

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts