Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Warburton Expat's avatar

A good analysis.

I should note that I was sceptical of Higgins' claims, mainly because of her ambitious publicity-seeking years afterwards; I projected that behaviour backwards to her original claim. But His Honour did a very thorough job of walking us through the evidence, and so I became convinced that Lehrmann raped her.

As to your point about "I am a good person, therefore I must sue" - Rory Miller who writes on violence a lot describes six levels of violence,

nice - manipulative - assertive - aggressive - assaultive - murderous

with each person tending to stay at one level, have contempt for people at a lower level, and be fearful and uncomprehending of people at a higher level.

Most of us will imagine that what is labelled "violent" crime can only include assaultive and murderous levels, or at least aggressive (as with threats and incitement). But I would suggest that Lehrmann's behaviour in plying a woman with multiple drinks, feeling her up, taking her to a place without others around and then raping her when she was either unconscious or barely so represents someone on the "manipulative" level.

The thing about the manipulative level is that the person can more readily convince themselves that they were in fact not doing harm - they can manipulate themselves, too. The person who caves someone's skull in with a claw hammer may believe they did the right or necessary thing, but they cannot deny they did harm. The manipulative person will be better at self-delusion.

Expand full comment
Ofifoto's avatar

Thank you for this clear and succinct explanation of a case that has been so abominably noisy elsewhere. It also helped me reconcile other thoughts that have troubled me about criminal cases and jury decisions.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts