Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Potts's avatar

Every single word here is true, yet unfortunately in the marketplace of ideas this argument becomes self-defeating:

Advocates: you have to engage with an argument, even when you disagree with the conclusion.

Activists: no we don't.

Advocates: [make the argument for academic open-mindedness]

Activists: [don't engage because they disagree with the conclusion]

How, practically, are those of us who believe in intellectual curiosity supposed to get around this problem?

Expand full comment
Chris Bond's avatar

My immediate impression of one of your quoted bits of text: Roddy Meagher, Dyson Heydon and Mark Leeming would have benefitted from some 'Plain English Campaign' advice. I lost the will to live, or at least the inclination to try to figure out what the heck they were trying to say, before I got to the end of the 1st para. But glad that you are willing to plough through and translate for future generations!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts