A fifth annoying possibility is when the reviewer thinks that they know more than you do about a point of fact that you researched exhaustively for your Doctoral thesis or other work demonstrating your expertise, requiring you to once again marshal a body of evidence to show that the reviewer is talking through their mortarboard and that your point should stand without correction.
Am I weird that I find it hilarious that I found an error in this as soon as I published it? OF COURSE I DID.
A fifth annoying possibility is when the reviewer thinks that they know more than you do about a point of fact that you researched exhaustively for your Doctoral thesis or other work demonstrating your expertise, requiring you to once again marshal a body of evidence to show that the reviewer is talking through their mortarboard and that your point should stand without correction.
Oh goodness yes!
Best description of the process ever - clear and reassuring. Do you mind if I share?!
Please do share! I’d be delighted.